Punjab and Sindh on eve of Alexander’s conquest (on modern Pakistan map)

IndiaSpeaks Official
3 min readDec 4, 2021

By u/sri_mahalingam

Disclaimers: This is a reconstructed political map of the parts of ancient India that Alexander campaigned in, largely based on Arrian. AFAIK Alexander never entered the territory of modern-day India (other than parts of Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir, which are included in this map), which lay beyond the Beas river. The map also does not include the regions of Balochistan, Afghanistan or Central Asia, even though Alexander did conquer these regions.

As in general with most ancient states, borders weren’t necessarily precisely demarcated, and sovereignity was more “fluid” (in India, the political theory used to describe this system was called rajamandala). In particular, even when borders are demarcated, I don’t exactly have the information to thoroughly reconstruct the control over each inch of land; instead, I’ve gathered what information exists and filled in the remaining areas based on what seemed likely or possible. Where there are arbitrary choices, I’ve detailed them below.

Cophen campaign

A people called Aspasioi are found in the Choes (either the Alishang or the Kunar) valley and a people called Assakenoi in the Swat Valley. The Guraeans ruled in the Panjkora valley of the Upper Dir district.

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=gYg8AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA352

The Kunar Valley starts at Chitral, flows through the Kunar province of Afghanistan, and returns to Pakistan through the Khyber district, until Attock.

The Swat Valley corresponds to the modern-day Swat district. The Assakenoi also controlled the Buner district, and the city of Aornos may have been on Pir Sar in the Shangla district. Pushkalavati, the former seat of Achaemenid power in Gandhara, located on the border of Charsadda and Peshawar, also likely came under their influence in this period.

Narain, A. K. (1965). Alexander the Great: Greece and Rome — 12. pp. 155–165.

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=t5g2EAAAQBAJ&pg=PA24

The Guraeans seemed to have been vassals of the Aspasioi, as the city of Arigaion in Bajaur district is attributed to both of them (sorta).

Dodge, Theodore (1890). Alexander. Pennsylvania: Stackpole Books. p. 519.

Abisares was an ally of the Assakenoi, and ruled in Kashmir (including the Pakistan-controlled part shown in the map, and e.g. Rajouri in the India-controlled part).

The part of Ancient Gandhara not attributed to one of these tribes, I have attributed to Taxila.

Hydapses campaign

Porus ruled between the Jhelum and the Chenab rivers.

A certain Glausaes ruled to his North-East.

To his South-East, between the Chenab and Ravi rivers, ruled “the other Porus”, an enemy of Porus, possibly his cousin.

Sakala was not part of this territory, instead belonging to the war-like Cathaeans who originated further East.

Arrian doesn’t name the rulers of the territory between the Ravi and Beas rivers, but Diodorus states it was ruled by numerous divided states including Sophytes, Phegus, the Adrestians etc.

Bosworth, Albert Brian (1993). “From the Hydaspes to the Southern Ocean”. Conquest and Empire: The Reign of Alexander the Great. Cambridge University Press.

Arrian, The Anabasis of Alexander, 5.21–22.

Southern Punjab

Alexander subjugated some unnamed Indian states during his voyage down the Jhelum, probably located on its West bank.

Arrian, The Anabasis of Alexander, 6.4.

He then traveled down the Chenab. Here too, several unnamed rulers refused to submit to him. Interestingly, Arrian does not describe battles with these rulers, instead merely saying that Alexander prevented them from aiding the Malloi further South (who were preparing for battle against Alexander).

Arrian, The Anabasis of Alexander, 6.5.

At the intersection of the Ravi and the Chenab was where the next described battle takes place. The Malloi ruled directly South of this confluence, and I assume that this corresponds to the modern-day Multan division (i.e. as far as the Sutlej-Chenab confluence).

The Malloi allied with the Oxydraci, their historical enemies. Their territory is not known. However, I will note that Arrian does not mention any battles between the Sutlej-Chenab confluence and the Chenab-Indus Confluence, thus I assume this region belonged to the Oxydraci.

The Bahawalpur region has been identified as a Yaudheya stronghold at some point, and I’ve colored it accordingly.

Sindh

Musicanus and Oxycanus were likely plains-dwelling rulers in Sindh. Sambus likely had a more mountainous territory in the Western part of Sindh. Patala was a kingdom in the Sindh river delta.

Post on IndiaSpeaks by u/sri_mahalingam

--

--

IndiaSpeaks Official

Namaskaram, We are a friendly and user-focused community for Redditors from India. Join us at https://www.reddit.com/r/IndiaSpeaks